rcols/wcols users: I just added support to wcols for 2-D pdls and discovered that it was not the inverse operation to rcols---which I think it should be.
The rcols implementation uses dim(0) for input columns for the 1-D inputs, but dim(1) for the multi-column inputs. The wcols implementation uses dog on the 2-D input pdls and then does the original wcols output so effectively, both cases use dim(0). My thought is to modify the rcols 2-D support so that the columns in the file always to to dim(0) in the pdls. That would be consistent with wcols usage and with the general idea of things happening on dim(0) and threading on higher dims---not that we thread with [rw]cols at this time. This also makes the rcols consistent with the original get_data() routine by Maggie which motivated the development of 2-D support. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
