On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Puneet Kishor <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:11 AM, David Mertens wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Mr. Puneet Kishor <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ..
> >>
> >> My greatest obstacle to using PDL right now is wrapping my head around
> its
> >> idiosyncrasies (I have to stop thinking like perl data structures and
> start
> >> thinking piddles), and especially being able to write my own PP code (or
> >> whatever the correct term is).
> >>
> > ..
> > Puneet -
> >
> > I wrote an introduction to PDL::PP for the Book. I would love to have
> some
> > feedback if you have time to give it a read.
> >
> > The pod is here:
> >
> http://pdl.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=pdl/pdl-book;a=blob_plain;f=PDL/Book/PP.pod;hb=HEAD
> .
> > I use some internal code listings for testing purposes so I recommend
> > copying the text and putting it through perldoc rather than reading the
> pod
> > directly.
> >
>
>
> This is really tremendous, and deserves more prominent, front-page
> billing. In fact, it would be nice if this were available as a nicely
> formatted html page,


Yes, that is the purpose of the book, of which this is only one chapter. We
hope to distribute HTML and PDF copies, I believe, though precisely what we
create and where/how its distributed is still up in the air. Much credit
should go to Matt for spearheading the effort, and Chris for prodding Matt.
I never would have written this if I didn't have a good outlet for it.


> but better yet, as a tutorial in a(n ideally browser-based... Joel, any
> news back from Miyagawa on implementing a browser-based PDL shell on
> dotcloud?) PDL shell.
>

Eh, Inline::Pdlpp doesn't work very well in the PDL shell unless you're
careful with it, and since it ultimately compiles C code, it's bound to be
insecure. But I see your point. Having an online don't-even-need-to-install
option to learn PDL::PP would be very nice.


> Am still going through it, but am already learning a lot. Augmenting it
> with more examples of code would be great as well.
>

More examples? I tried hard to reach a balance between examples and prose.
If you think more examples would be helpful, perhaps we can work on a
cookbook chapter for PP.


> Thanks David. Great contribution, once again you score.
>

Thank you very much. :-)


>  --
> Puneet Kishor
>

David

-- 
Sent via my carrier pigeon.
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to