On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Kenworthy < [email protected]> wrote:
> >> The scripts in Doc/ seem pretty complicated for what *seems* to be a > >> simple job - pull out the POD, convert to Man and HTML pages, and to > >> set up pdldoc in the right place. > > > > The main thing is that the scripts include modified > > versions of some now-standard Pod modules. As part > > of the PDL cleanup, I have planned to remove our > > internal (and now outdated/bogus) copies and update > > the code to use the current standard Pod modules. > > > > These fixes will be after PDL-2.4.10. Are your > > questions related to PDL::Book in some way? > > As I proofread some sections, it is relatively easy to add any > new/specific tags as I go along, so if there was some specific > PDL::Pod tag to add, I would have done it now. > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > Matthew - I believe Chris is referring to the =for ref, =for signature, and other special markups that PDL docs use. The book does not (and should not) provide such reference documentation, so this should be OK. Is this correct, Chris? David -- Sent via my carrier pigeon.
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
