On 1/25/2012 12:19 PM, David Mertens wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Kenworthy<
[email protected]> wrote:
The scripts in Doc/ seem pretty complicated for what *seems* to be a
simple job - pull out the POD, convert to Man and HTML pages, and to
set up pdldoc in the right place.
The main thing is that the scripts include modified
versions of some now-standard Pod modules. As part
of the PDL cleanup, I have planned to remove our
internal (and now outdated/bogus) copies and update
the code to use the current standard Pod modules.
These fixes will be after PDL-2.4.10. Are your
questions related to PDL::Book in some way?
As I proofread some sections, it is relatively easy to add any
new/specific tags as I go along, so if there was some specific
PDL::Pod tag to add, I would have done it now.
Matt
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
Matthew -
I believe Chris is referring to the =for ref, =for signature, and other
special markups that PDL docs use. The book does not (and should not)
provide such reference documentation, so this should be OK.
Is this correct, Chris?
David
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/pipermail/perldl/2012-January/006116.html
is the previous email. The issue was having a ToC and an
Index for PDL::Book. A hand generated ToC is ok but an
index is trickier. The X<> tags need to be added and the
pod processed for the index (perhaps with the module
thoughts from the previous list message).
--Chris
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
