I would have to build a accelerator, and smash the proof out of those little
particles...
or calculate the vortex energy in the electron; quantum entangle them then send
information
threw them , while ruling out any other possible transfer mechanism, ie.. radio
waves (microwaves) .. ect
or calculate the vertex energy in the electron and pull out the dark matter
disassembling the electron photonic
acceleration bending, then duplicate the results over and over ...
-Mark
________________________________
From: Jürgen Mück <[email protected]>
To: MARK BAKER <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Perldl] radial power spectrum
Am 28.02.2013 um 00:33 schrieb MARK BAKER <[email protected]>:
>
>yes your right Dimensional analysis..
>
>if they have it covered why are they still debating whether there is 80% of
>dark matter in the universe ???
>
Mark,
after finding the World Formular - how will you verify it?
>
>-Mark
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Joel Berger <[email protected]>
>To: MARK BAKER <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [Perldl] radial power spectrum
>
>
>Mark, I think you are just talking about unit transform, or dimensional
>analysis? Am I correct? If this is the case, I think the astrophysicist have
>that one covered :-)
>
>
>Though of course I could be misunderstanding you.
>
>
>Joel
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:25 PM, MARK BAKER <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>That is really Fascinating, may be there might be a underlying representation
>>of
>>
>>this tho not ordered (I think that is what you meant by Theoretical models)
>>
>>
>>I will do some googling to see if I can perhaps find some commonly used
>>units in astronomy, as well I will do some book search, It seems like
>>
>>something like this, should be beneficial for both astronomy and molecular
>>
>>physics, I will see if I can find a list of units to work with...
>>
>>
>>maybe this can help to find the dimension of Dark Matter...
>>my guess is it would be a dimension integrated of [mass]^-6 .. [mass]^-11
>>
>>
>>
>>Cheers-Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Jarle Brinchmann <[email protected]>
>>To: Craig DeForest <[email protected]>
>>Cc: MARK BAKER <[email protected]>; """[email protected]"""
>><[email protected]>
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:47 PM
>>
>>Subject: Re: [Perldl] radial power spectrum
>>
>>
>>To follow up on what Craig says, what you are describing, Mark, is indeed
>>something we do regularly in extra-galactic astronomy but the transformation
>>of image values has to go through a mapping which is ultimately based on
>>theoretical models.
>>
>>Thus if you have flux with an effective wavelength of l1 and l2, say, there
>>are functions that you can apply that can map
>>
>> G[ f(l1), f(l2)] -> Mass of stars
>>
>>for instance. There are a number of technical problems with this, however,
>>not least that the function is often multi-valued - for a given x, y there
>>are a number of possible G(x, y). These problems are usually even more
>>serious when you consider other possible physical quantities you might want
>>to extract from the images such as mean ages or metal content. However it is
>>a major area of research in astronomy and is indeed very valuable - if you
>>want an overview you can do worse than consult the very recent review
article on the subject: http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2013arXiv1301.7095C.
>>
>>Other wavelengths than the optical provide other information but the general
>>idea is much the same although there are quantities that are more reliably
>>estimated from the data. And expanding the spectral dimension so that you do
>>not have several colours, but rather have a spectrum in each spatial pixel
>>provides even more of an improvement and optimally exploiting this dimension
>>is still work in progress I would say, at least for distant galaxies.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jarle.
>>
>>
>>
>>On 27 Feb 2013, at 22:34, Craig DeForest wrote:
>>
>>> Well, there are a lot of things different people have gotten from images -
>>> but, fundamentally, all that astronomers get from images is brightness
>>> versus arrival angle and wavelength. Spectral power density, in the context
>>> of an image, is a map of how much brightness exists at
different spatial scales in the image -- i.e. if there are a lot of big,
diffuse things, there will be a lot of spectral power at low spatial
frequencies (big spatial scales), and not much at high spatial frequencies
(small spatial scales).
>>>
>>> You see astronomers talking about mass of this and mass of that, but those
>>> masses are inferred using methods that are far more sophisticated and
>>> specialized than PDL::Transform can accomplish.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 2:26 PM, MARK BAKER <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Craig,
>>>>
>>>> [I'm not sure what you mean by, for example, "now we make a transformation
>>>> for Mass to any power".]
>>>>
>>>> so based on the position of each individual pixel and it's color compared
>>>> to other pixels and there color...
>>>> we should be
able to map transformations of different Dimensions , yet to do this simply we
have to have
>>>> known mapping transformations of known Dimensions, then we should be able
>>>> to derive
>>>> mapping transformations of any dimension.
>>>>
>>>> This Idea would change the pixel colors and pixel position to highlight
>>>> different dimensional values.
>>>>
>>>> if you can send me a list of commonly used Astronomical dimensions that
>>>> have been measured accurately
>>>> from a image , I should be able to show you a better explanation
>>>> Mathematically
>>>>
>>>> just send me a list of units like the "Spectral Power Density" used in
>>>> Astronomical transformations
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> -Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Craig DeForest <[email protected]>
>>>> To: MARK BAKER <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Craig DeForest <[email protected]>; John Lapeyre
>>>> <[email protected]>; ""[email protected]""
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:04 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Perldl] radial power spectrum
>>>>
>>>> Mark, I'm not sure what you're getting at here. The Transform module only
>>>> does
coordinate transformations on data sets. It modifies vectors or images so
that the components of the vector, or pixel indices of the image, have a
different geometry than they originally did.
>>>>
>>>> An image, for example, is a collection of values taken at a regular grid
>>>> of positions (X,Y): one pixel index is proportional to X position in the
>>>> image, and the other pixel index is proportional to Y position in the
>>>> image. With Transform::map, you can resample the image so that the pixel
>>>> indices are proportional to some other parameter (like distance from a
>>>> particular point, or angle *around* that point).
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by, for example, "now we make a transformation
>>>> for Mass to any power".
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 1:44 PM, MARK BAKER <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you Might have hinted on to something very big here ...
>>>>> I thought about this for a while , and here is what I have
>>>>> if you have a know dimension that can be found threw image processing
>>>>> say ([mass][length]^3[time]^-4[current]^-2) and if you can find some
>>>>> other dimensions
>>>>> then you might be able to derive a image transform for each dimension
>>>>>
>>>>> as a example voltage/resistance = current so now you have the I
>>>>> (current) dimension
>>>>> resistance * capacitance = time so now we have our T (time) dimension
>>>>> speed of light / frequency = wave length so now we have our L (length))
>>>>> dimension (1/time = frequency)
>>>>> and now voltage * L^-2*T^3*I^1 = M so now we have our
Mass dimension
>>>>>
>>>>> now we make a transformation for Mass to any power
>>>>> now we make a transformation for Length to any power
>>>>> now we make a transformation for Time to any power
>>>>> now we make a transformation for current to any power
>>>>>
>>>>> by mixing those dimensions now now we can process a value for any
>>>>> unit Dimension like the Power spectral density = [Mass]*[Length]^2 *
>>>>> [Time]-2
>>>>>
>>>>> with this Idea you can calculate all 194481 value in string theory of the
>>>>> image ...
>>>>>
>>>>> if you can find a few different transformations and can send them to me
>>>>> I would be happy to try to help build a multi-dimensional imaging engine
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Perfect Blessing's
>>>>> -Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> "sometimes I think perl is
alive".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: John Lapeyre <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: Craig DeForest <[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 1:26 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Perldl] radial power spectrum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Awesome. Thanks. Have fun!
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/23/2013 09:52 PM, Craig DeForest wrote:
>>>>> > I fft rhem use PDL::Transform
>>>>> for the radial
part. Periodic boundaries are your friend. Sorry
>>>>> for brief - on ski lift.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > (Mobile)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:40 AM, John Lapeyre
>>>>>
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> I want to compute the power spectral density of an image,
>>>>> and then
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> integrate over the azimuth to get a radial (in wavelengh)
>>>>> spectral
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> density. I wonder if anyone has code to do this ? I am
>>>>> trying to cook
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> up something with rvals, and whichND, but I don't want to
>>>>> waste time
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> if it is already coded.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Perldl mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Perldl mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Perldl mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Perldl mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Perldl mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>Perldl mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
