> Thanks for the report -- fixed in git.
Thanks for fixing it so promptly!
I haven't tried the new git version, but I found a related bug and a surprise:
pdl> use PDL::Complex
pdl> p cat(pdl(1),pdl(2*i))
[1 2]
I guess this is the same bug as before.
pdl> p cat(pdl(2*i), pdl(1))
[0 +2i 1 +1i]
This may be suprising, as it might be expected that the real number
pdl(1) gets complexified to 1+0*i, but actually, the threading machine adds a
dummy dimension that converts pdl(1) to the vector [1,1] which is
interpreted as 1+1i. The relation between complex numbers and size 2
vectors has to be handled with care. What would the result of
cat(pdl(1),pdl(2*i)) using the current git version? [1+1i,0+2i] or
[1+0i,0,2i]?
Best regards,
Luis
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
