Craig, David,
Thanks for your helpful explanations and for the work invested in
this nice, useful and powerful software!
Regards,
Luis
ps. Sorry if you receive this twice, but yesterday's email seems to
have vanished.
David Mertens <[email protected]> wrote:
>Luis -
>
>I remember putting a lot of effort a few years ago into getting cat to
>do
>the right thing for a number of scenarios, and to report the right
>error
>when things failed. Over the course of this, I realized that you can
>use
>pdl() to concatenate stuff in a way that more forgiving and which
>almost
>always Does What You Mean. Because it is more relaxed, I recommend
>using it
>instead of using cat unless you explicitly want the dimension checks
>that
>cat is supposed to provide.
>
>That said, ironing out these issues with cat is a Good Thing. :-)
>
>David
>
>
>On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Craig DeForest
><[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I would have to check, since I haven't used the complex code in
>donkey's
>> years. The current git should give the same answer as glue. The
>> constructor itself should do the Right thing - e.g.
>pdl(pdl(1),pdl(2*i)) -
>> since it zero-pads short elements in its arg list.
>>
>> (Mobile)
>> ...
--
o
W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | [email protected] /\_/\__/
GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
