It could work but what is also needed is someone who understands the issues with the Mac OS X platforms enough to sort out any issues for documentation and organization for the various options. They probably would need to use PDL on a Mac, at least enough to verify things for the release.
--Chris On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Karl Glazebrook <[email protected]>wrote: > > If Matt could do SciPDL and Mark could go MacPorts would that cover it? > > Karl > > > On 05/05/2013, at 3:53 AM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That would be great! I believe there already is a macports done for an > earlier release of PDL. Updating it to the latest should be mostly > tweaking and checking rather than writing from scratch. Sorry I can't be > more specific but "no speak mac" :-) > > > > --Chris > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Mark Grimes <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have some experience creating macports. I'd be happy to look into > > packaging PDL. I've never had any issue installing it via cpanm (into > > local::lib with a perlbrew'ed perl), so I would be surprised if > > packaging it was all that difficult. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Perldl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Perldl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > >
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
