Great! The only catch is that for PDL versions before 2.007, PDL_Indx doesn't exist so that case needs to be handled.
--Chris On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:41 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- From: Chris Marshall > > >>> I haven't looked into this at all - I'll wait and see if Doug has a quick >>> solution. > > >> I took a look and the warnings could be fixed by modifying >> the .pd file to use the right data type for those declarations >> but it seemed that hacking just that in would be the wrong >> thing to do. > > > Well ... that fixes the problem for me. It results in no test failures at > all !! > > Here's the actual patch I used: > > --- plplot.pd_orig 2013-11-10 11:27:16 > +++ plplot.pd 2013-11-10 11:18:36 +1100 > @@ -3813,7 +3813,7 @@ > pdl *x_pdl, *y_pdl; > PLFLT *tx, *ty; > SV *x_sv, *y_sv; > - int dims, i; > + PDL_Indx dims, i; > I32 count, ax; > dSP; > > Cheers, > Rob _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
