On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:04:34PM +0000, Piers Cawley wrote:
> So, I'm messing around with stuff and I got bored of writing out all
> that guff in the various foo.t type tests and came up with something
> that'll let me do:
>
> foo.t
>
> use Test::Unit::TestMaker qw/Some::Test::Class/;
>
> run_tests;
Looks like we're getting back to test coverage/suit generation issues
again.
I've got my system for checking a) module level and b) method level
test coverage. Adam has his own (much prettier) system which has a
different set of functionality. Sounds like you're rolling yours and
starting from a different place too.
Integrating these is going to be fun. 8-)
Should we start getting a spec together for the functionality we'll
need? IMHO test coverage should be linked in with the suit generation
stuff, particularly so we can use the new sane inheritance code. There
are problems when you start importing stuff though...
Matthew #8-)
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
