Matthew Astley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:04:34PM +0000, Piers Cawley wrote:
>
> > So, I'm messing around with stuff and I got bored of writing out all
> > that guff in the various foo.t type tests and came up with something
> > that'll let me do:
> >
> > foo.t
> >
> > use Test::Unit::TestMaker qw/Some::Test::Class/;
> >
> > run_tests;
>
> Looks like we're getting back to test coverage/suit generation issues
> again.
>
> I've got my system for checking a) module level and b) method level
> test coverage. Adam has his own (much prettier) system which has a
> different set of functionality. Sounds like you're rolling yours and
> starting from a different place too.
This has definitely got nothing to do with coverage. I just wanted to
get rid of all that extra flarp that goes in a foo.t file. You still
need to write your test methods, and Test::Unit::TestCase and friends
already build 'mini' suites of test methods...
Admittedly the brainstorming code that's shown after that does rather
more than that, but it's still got nothing to do with coverage.
--
Piers
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
