Andy Smith wrote:
Okay well we'll have to agree to disagree as I don't believe this or
any of the other examples you give will do anything to convince a
non-technical person that the above is not the case.
I know a Judge and he uses Outlook for Email and IE7 for web browsing.
He would certainly know an email address from a URL, and what to do with
each of them, even if he has to get me to reboot his ADSL router :-)
How would you argue that a URL to a web form complies with the S.I. :-
"(a) the name of the service provider;
(b) the geographic address at which the service provider is established;
(c) the details of the service provider, *including his electronic mail
address*, which make it possible to contact him rapidly and communicate
with him in a direct and effective manner;"
I can see how the web form does the last bit, but there is an explicit
requirement for an email address.
Phil
_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
