Another vote for number 2
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Whitaker
Sent: 21 April 2010 10:57
To: Peterborough LUG - No commercial posts
Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Changing the list reply method - opinions sought
On 21 Apr 2010, at 10:47, Mark Rogers wrote:
> We have two options.
> Method 1 ("Reply-To munging"):
> - Hit "reply", and the message gets addressed to the list.
> - Hit "reply to all", and the message gets addressed to both the
> previous sender, and the list.
>
> Or method 2:
> - Hit "reply", and the message gets addressed to the sender of the
> message you're replying to (eg me if you were to reply to this one).
> - Hit "reply to all", and the message gets addressed to both the
> previous sender, and the list.
> - Hit "reply to list" (if your mail client has it), and your message
> gets addressed to the list.
>
> ...
> That said, I am still +1 for changing the way replies are handled.
Vote for method 2 here.
_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
____________________________________________________________________________
________
_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
