I would vote for method 2 as well.
However, I can see a lot of people missing this and posts of interest being
taken from the mailing list, and only continuing between two people.
Stuck between a rock and a hard place?
Tom
On 21 Apr 2010, at 10:56, Mike Whitaker wrote:
>
> On 21 Apr 2010, at 10:47, Mark Rogers wrote:
>
>> We have two options.
>> Method 1 ("Reply-To munging"):
>> - Hit "reply", and the message gets addressed to the list.
>> - Hit "reply to all", and the message gets addressed to both the
>> previous sender, and the list.
>>
>> Or method 2:
>> - Hit "reply", and the message gets addressed to the sender of the
>> message you're replying to (eg me if you were to reply to this one).
>> - Hit "reply to all", and the message gets addressed to both the
>> previous sender, and the list.
>> - Hit "reply to list" (if your mail client has it), and your message
>> gets addressed to the list.
>>
>> ...
>
>> That said, I am still +1 for changing the way replies are handled.
>
> Vote for method 2 here.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peterboro mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
