Etags search for _n_ I assumed that you did this. Barry
On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> > wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > > They are identical. > > Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about > the other one. I have removed it. > > > > Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix? > > Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that > didn't not need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this > change in changes/dev.html! > > Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the > value in having two different ones since they generally seem to > serve the same purpose. Who will fix this? > > Where is all this stuff (and what) ? > > Matt > > Barry > > > Jed > > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener