On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > Etags search for _n_ I assumed that you did this. > This is definitely not me. Matt > Barry > > > On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote: >> >> They are identical. >> >> Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about the >> other one. I have removed it. >> >> >> >> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix? >> >> Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that didn't not >> need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this change in >> changes/dev.html! >> >> Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the value >> in having two different ones since they generally seem to serve the same >> purpose. Who will fix this? >> >> Where is all this stuff (and what) ? >> >> Matt >> >> Barry >> >> >> Jed >> >> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100107/724134a7/attachment.html>