On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > until we move to bitbucket - can you continue to push to petsc.cs.iit > > - and not bitbucket? [for now - pushes to petsc.cs.iit are > > automatically pushed to bitbucket] > > > > I thought we were switched already :) I cannot understand why we would not > give up this maintenance burden (and directories is not a good enough > reason).
For my part - I generally don't like the way the change is pushed. - one prblem => suggest change to a new system [not evaluating all the features we currently have vs what we loose] - and I really get annoyed when a problem is pointed out with the new sytem - and the solution to that is: the current model is workng - but antique - lets change it to fix for this new system we are pusing Wrt current admin overhead - its not that much. Most of the work is adding new users [not modifying user keys]. This part of admin work will is exist with bitbucket. The other systrem admin part is not much. Jsut reboot the machine when there is a kernel update. Also the reliability aspect of such sites is also verblown. I'm sure some of them had their outages. [maybe not bit bucket - but some of them do]. Satish
