My summary would be that 1. Git's ui is bad 2. There is the crappy index thingie 3. I don't see how git branches are better than hg bookmarks (again, the ui is bad). 4. I still use multiple repos along with branches in git. 5. I am willing to bet money Satish will use multiple repos, rather than branches. On Jan 9, 2013 10:12 PM, "Dmitry Karpeev" <karpeev at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2013 10:10 PM, "Sean Farley" <sean.michael.farley at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> > wrote: > > > I personally find git (and its branches) rather cumbersome and wish > libmesh > > > used mercurial instead :-) > > > > Not to mention git's atrocious interface. > Yes, I forgot to mention that. > > > > > And if hgsubversion actually worked there would no need for git :-) > > > > I've used that to access libmesh all the time; what didn't work? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130109/42809477/attachment.html>