On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Blaise A Bourdin wrote: > > > > > the usual naming scheme is just the version number, but for petsc, most > > supercomputing centers use %version-%arch > > > the installer will copy the file into $MODULEPATH/petsc/%version-%arch, > > or the user to $HOME/.modulefiles > > > > > > Of course, %version-%arch is a really silly name out of context. How > > about petsc-%version-%arch, somewhere within $PETSC_DIR/$PETSC_ARCH, or > > $PETSC_DIR/$PETSC_ARCH/modulefiles/%version-%arch ? > > > > And PETSC_ARCH has no singificance with prefix install [the > > significant text is in the prefix-path - and one doesn't have to match > > PETSC_ARCH to this significant text] > > > > Are you pushing this or should i? > > > > BTW: Is the following notation ok? [google didn't help] > > > > prepend-path PATH /home/balay/spetsc/asterix64/bin:/home/balay/spetsc/bin > > > > I have some fixes [except for the modfile name] which I can push. > > > > Cool, do it.
pushed my changes. Satish