Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: > Why can't TS handle that? Users always prefer to use the lowest > level thing available, that doesn't mean it is right. > > In the language of TS what does a "funky system, liked mixed > particle-field," mean, does it require a little more API on our > side? I'm much rather have Emil and Jed control the time-stepping > then some ignorant user.
Dofs move to different processes at each stage. That isn't compatible with Vec. Do we need to overhaul Vec before users can integrate such a system? Practicality wins over purity.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
