> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote: > > Does ExodusII write pnetcdf? It's a different interface from (parallel) > NetCDF4.
Shudder! > > Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Blaise really wants to write in parallel. It would be better to use HDF5, >> but evidently >> it is broken in ExodusII. Thats what we get for using something from >> Sandia. They >> finally have their revenge. >> >> Matt >> >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> >>> Do you really need to use pnetcdf? No one uses it and what usefulness >>> does it really provide, best to be avoided. >>> >>> Barry >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>>> >>>> parallel-netcdf-1.9.0.pre1/INSTALL has: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> 4. Reporting Installation or Usage Problems >>>> =========================================== >>>> >>>> Please send an email to parallel-net...@mcs.anl.gov >>>> >>>> <<<<<< >>>> >>>> We'll have to send in these bug reports. >>>> >>>> Satish >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote: >>>> >>>>> The configure is broken, perhaps beyond fixing. I need to give >>> --with-mpi >>>>> to get anything >>>>> to work because the way it checks for MPI is screwed up. I will see if I >>>>> can throw away all its idiotic configure stuff in favor of just telling >>> it >>>>> everything, but I am not eager to depend on something so rickety. >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>