If I'm not mistaken, the line is pf.c:2190 's->nat_rule->states++;'. If you have pf.c prior to 1.278, that would explain the crash, it was fixed with 1.278 later that day (s->nat-rule could be NULL before).
Daniel
If I'm not mistaken, the line is pf.c:2190 's->nat_rule->states++;'. If you have pf.c prior to 1.278, that would explain the crash, it was fixed with 1.278 later that day (s->nat-rule could be NULL before).
Daniel