On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:09:05PM +0100, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, the line is pf.c:2190 's->nat_rule->states++;'. > > If you have pf.c prior to 1.278, that would explain the crash, it was > fixed with 1.278 later that day (s->nat-rule could be NULL before).
I figured that something like that would be the case. I no longer have the old sources to confirm this, so I'll rebuild now and hopefully all will be well. Thanks. - jolan
