Daniel & pf list
I like this idea { wiki } that is. Using the list would be fine
but the wiki is better. I have been using pf since 3.0 and have a pretty
solid feel for --current and --stable rule-sets and think this would be a
good chance to get some community rule-sets ready for examples, seeing how
a lot has been added to pf since 3.2 props to you pf developers.
just my .02¢ on this subject.
Jason Houx
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:51:48AM -0800, Adam Shephard wrote:
>
> > They asked all of their users who were using IPTABLES
> > to send in their list of rules with clear comments
> > explaining each rules. Once it looked like everything
> > was received, they sent out a zip files containing all
> > the files.
> >
> > Any interest in something like that for pf?
>
> I can't speak for the subscribers, you'd have to comment on whether
> you'd like to do this on the mailing list itself.
>
> Maybe a Wiki like http://www.obsd.pronym.org/wiki/ would be simpler,
> people could just put their rulesets on a page and others could edit
> them and add comments inline.
>
> We tend to get a fair amount of requests of the type "here's my ruleset,
> please comment on it". If everyone is willing to contribute their
> comments (and not just post their rulesets, waiting for comments, not
> reading other poster's rules), I guess it would be useful, and we might
> collect the most interesting rulesets for the documentation.
>
> So, I'm willing to contribute, but I'm not offering to review two dozen
> uncommented production rulesets all by myself :)
>
> Daniel
>
