PF rule-sets are a very good idea - also include context - like bridgename.if files
should<->there be categories - like PF with: transparent bridging, ftp-proxy, 802.11, email filtering..... good idea - I can learn lots from something like this - Ed -----Original Message----- From: Jason Houx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:39 PM To: Daniel Hartmeier Cc: Adam Shephard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Compendium of pf rules (Was: RFC#1 - chmod pf.conf ) Daniel & pf list I like this idea { wiki } that is. Using the list would be fine but the wiki is better. I have been using pf since 3.0 and have a pretty solid feel for --current and --stable rule-sets and think this would be a good chance to get some community rule-sets ready for examples, seeing how a lot has been added to pf since 3.2 props to you pf developers. just my .02¢ on this subject. Jason Houx On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:51:48AM -0800, Adam Shephard wrote: > > > They asked all of their users who were using IPTABLES > > to send in their list of rules with clear comments > > explaining each rules. Once it looked like everything > > was received, they sent out a zip files containing all > > the files. > > > > Any interest in something like that for pf? > > I can't speak for the subscribers, you'd have to comment on whether > you'd like to do this on the mailing list itself. > > Maybe a Wiki like http://www.obsd.pronym.org/wiki/ would be simpler, > people could just put their rulesets on a page and others could edit > them and add comments inline. > > We tend to get a fair amount of requests of the type "here's my ruleset, > please comment on it". If everyone is willing to contribute their > comments (and not just post their rulesets, waiting for comments, not > reading other poster's rules), I guess it would be useful, and we might > collect the most interesting rulesets for the documentation. > > So, I'm willing to contribute, but I'm not offering to review two dozen > uncommented production rulesets all by myself :) > > Daniel >
