On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:20:53AM +1000, Damian McGuckin wrote: > With OpenBSD being so much more better quality than a lot of the vendor > proprietary systems, I have gotten complacent. This is the first time I > have had to load anything other than errata with OpenBSD since about 2.5. > I have to relearn web-based CVS everytime. I must be getting old. I'll > have to get into the habit more.
> That would have ramifications for ESP and AH as well. Serious. Yes, hence it was pulled into -stable, too. Not everything that gets pulled into -stable also gets an errata entry (only fixes for severe security problems do), if you check errata you realize it's still empty, even though there have been at least a dozen commits to -stable already. So, if you want to stay up to date about productivity/reliability fixes in -stable, you basically have to subscribe to source-changes@ and read the message with "OPENBSD_3_3" in the body. Or search for that tag in the source-changes@ archive (monkey.org has one, for instance). If you'd rather have a web page like errata.html, step up and maintain it (by reading source-changes@ and adding the relevant entries). The main reason why it doesn't exist is that it takes some time and work to do :) Daniel
