On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit : >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every >>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend >>>> they're supported. >>>> >>> >>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on >>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to >>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big >>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they >>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with >>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases. >> >> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen >> anyway). Oops. >> >> I'll look into it. >> > > Thanks :)
Done. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
