Le 25/10/2010 04:59, Dave Page a écrit : > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit : >>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >>> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every >>>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend >>>>> they're supported. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on >>>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to >>>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big >>>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they >>>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with >>>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases. >>> >>> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen >>> anyway). Oops. >>> >>> I'll look into it. >>> >> >> Thanks :) > > Done. >
Thanks, Dave. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
