BTW; Ashesh, can you please ensure there's an RM ticket for this, as it's obviously of interest to users.
Thanks. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Ashesh Vashi < > ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Ashesh Vashi < >>> ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> Committed! >>>> >>> >>> I agree with the change from a preventative/safety perspective, though >>> I'm struggling to classify it as a security issue, given that collections >>> are always named by the code and not from user input. >>> >>> Am I missing something? >>> >> True - but not the case with the server-group. >> It is a collection node, still has it's own label. >> > > Ahh, yes. > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
