Sure - I will create one. On May 10, 2017 14:05, "Dave Page" <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> BTW; Ashesh, can you please ensure there's an RM ticket for this, as it's > obviously of interest to users. > > Thanks. > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Ashesh Vashi < >> ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Ashesh Vashi < >>>> ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> Committed! >>>>> >>>> >>>> I agree with the change from a preventative/safety perspective, though >>>> I'm struggling to classify it as a security issue, given that collections >>>> are always named by the code and not from user input. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something? >>>> >>> True - but not the case with the server-group. >>> It is a collection node, still has it's own label. >>> >> >> Ahh, yes. >> >> -- >> Dave Page >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com >> Twitter: @pgsnake >> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >> > > > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
