> Le 03/08/2010 03:48, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : > >>>> AFAICT, it works really good. We still miss pgsql_pid. And should I add > >>>> some other reports? what do other people need? > >>>> > >>> > >>> No comments on this patch? meaning I should commit it or not? > >> > >> I was waiting for you add pgsql_pid. Have you done it? > > > > I have added new function: > > /* > > * Return pointer to i th child, j th connection pool and k th backend > > * of connection info on shmem. > > */ > > ConnectionInfo *pool_coninfo(int child, int connection_pool, int backend) > > > > I hope this will make your implementation regarding pgsql_pid easier. > > For example, pool_coninfo(10, 0, 1) will return pointer to > > ConnectionInfo corresponds to 1th backend pid which is in 0th > > connection pool in 10th pgpool child. > > Sorry for not answering sooner. I thought you were working on adding > pgsql_pid. There was a little misunderstanding :)
Oh, I thought I woould work on pcp command, you would work on show command. > But that's not an issue. I'll work on this. I already did a bit on it > yesterday evening. Didn't get far unfortunately. I'll look at this new > code. Thanks for that (and for all the work you're doing on pgPool these > days, I'm impressed). Thank you very much! Besides the work, I'm starting to update pgpool-en.html. I believe this will make cleaner what pgpool-II 3.0 will look like. As usual, my English is poor. I will appreciate for any suggestions to enhance the English docs. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
