Le 03/08/2010 12:23, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : >> Le 03/08/2010 03:48, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : >>>>>> AFAICT, it works really good. We still miss pgsql_pid. And should I add >>>>>> some other reports? what do other people need? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No comments on this patch? meaning I should commit it or not? >>>> >>>> I was waiting for you add pgsql_pid. Have you done it? >>> >>> I have added new function: >>> /* >>> * Return pointer to i th child, j th connection pool and k th backend >>> * of connection info on shmem. >>> */ >>> ConnectionInfo *pool_coninfo(int child, int connection_pool, int backend) >>> >>> I hope this will make your implementation regarding pgsql_pid easier. >>> For example, pool_coninfo(10, 0, 1) will return pointer to >>> ConnectionInfo corresponds to 1th backend pid which is in 0th >>> connection pool in 10th pgpool child. >> >> Sorry for not answering sooner. I thought you were working on adding >> pgsql_pid. There was a little misunderstanding :) > > Oh, I thought I woould work on pcp command, you would work on show > command. >
No problem :) I'll work on it ASAP. >> But that's not an issue. I'll work on this. I already did a bit on it >> yesterday evening. Didn't get far unfortunately. I'll look at this new >> code. Thanks for that (and for all the work you're doing on pgPool these >> days, I'm impressed). > > Thank you very much! Besides the work, I'm starting to update > pgpool-en.html. I believe this will make cleaner what pgpool-II 3.0 > will look like. As usual, my English is poor. I will appreciate for > any suggestions to enhance the English docs. Jean-Paul and I are waiting an update on the docs to proofread the english ones first. And then Jean-Paul is also willing to translate them in french. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
