On Tuesday 05 May 2009 16:35:11 Tom Lane wrote: > Marc Cousin <mcou...@sigma.fr> writes: > > [ can't cancel this query ] > > > > Index Scan using file_jpfid_idx on file (cost=0.00..7327212.07 > > rows=2128 width=104) > > Index Cond: (pathid = 120) > > > > "file_jpfid_idx" btree (jobid, pathid, filenameid) > > Hmm ... is it likely that index entries with pathid = 120 are *very* few > and far between in jobid order? It looks like we have no > CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls inside the loop in _bt_next(), which is > probably a mistake ... > > regards, tom lane
They are very few and far between... In fact. there are none, as I had just removed them and I wasn't sure of it, so I was double-checking before telling my colleagues it was OK :) -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
