great, thanks a lot... On Tuesday 05 May 2009 17:11:35 Tom Lane wrote: > Marc Cousin <mcou...@sigma.fr> writes: > > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 16:35:11 Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hmm ... is it likely that index entries with pathid = 120 are *very* few > >> and far between in jobid order? It looks like we have no > >> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls inside the loop in _bt_next(), which is > >> probably a mistake ... > > > > In fact. there are none, as I had just removed them and I wasn't sure of > > it, so I was double-checking before telling my colleagues it was OK :) > > OK, that explains it then :-(. I'll see about fixing this. > > regards, tom lane
-- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
