On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:46 +0200, Silvio Brandani wrote: >> The Slony solution could be a possibility but the production database is >> 80 Gb of data with around 10000 transaction each hour.
> Slony (or Londiste) can handle that without issue, at all. Bucardo, too. All three work on similar principles. rls -- :wq -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
