On 09/05/2012 4:59 PM, Craig James wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Mathias Breuninger > > I wasn't aware of the binary problem with replication. > > Maybe the PostgreSQL docs should emphasize the architecture > restriction. > > That's sort of what "binary file" means -- a raw, architecture-specific > representation of data that's optimized for performance and/or space, > not portability. > > Craig
In fact, it is written clearly in the docs (25.2.1 Planning: " In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."), but I missed it. So I apologize for the annoyance. Regards. -- Mathias -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
