Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was surprised that there was funcion names, since there shouldn't be
> any (no debugging symbols).

Not necessarily.  If you haven't applied strip(1) to the executable,
there will be function names in the backtrace on most platforms, even
without -g.  What -g adds is parameter info and file/line number info.

> Hence I think too, this backtrace is rubbish. :(

It is that :-(.  Better luck tomorrow.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to