Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What about "revert the patch"?
>>
>> That's probably just as dangerous.
> I don't feel comfortable either reverting such a big patch at last
> minute.
Yeah, I'm not very happy with that either. However, I've still got no
confidence in anything proposed so far.
> I'm testing the attached patch at the moment. It's the same as the
> previous one, with the elog() in mdsync() issue fixed.
This seems like a kluge on top of a hack. Can't we have the bgwriter
do the final checkpoint instead?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
