On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > On the other point: are we going to eliminate mdunlink's isRedo > parameter? Maybe the better thing is to have its callers pass the value > of InArchiveRecovery?
We have one caller that is using a parameter incorrectly. It seems we should correct the caller rather than change the API and potentially effect all callers. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
