On 15/05/10 05:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010: > > >> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious >> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a >> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the >> DATABASE item. >> >> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l >> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that >> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments? >> > +1 > Was this discussed change made? Was it backported, or only applied to head?
Thanks Russell -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
