On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Russell Smith <mr-r...@pws.com.au> wrote: > On 15/05/10 05:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010: >> >> >>> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious >>> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a >>> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the >>> DATABASE item. >>> >>> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l >>> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that >>> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments? >>> >> +1 >> > Was this discussed change made? Was it backported, or only applied to head?
I believe this is the commit: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=3a524653d18f29676b91f740634a673b72beb6b5 It looks like the code was changed, but I don't see any doc updates. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
