Tom Lane escreveu: > ISTM your > argument can be reduced to "there should be no hidden values ever", but > I doubt we're going to buy that. > No, the "hidden values" has their use case (hiding legal values that we don't want to expose, for example, true/false, 0/1, yes/no). My point is if they are not useful let's rip them to not confuse people.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
