Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane escreveu:
>> ISTM your
>> argument can be reduced to "there should be no hidden values ever", but
>> I doubt we're going to buy that.
> No, the "hidden values" has their use case (hiding legal values that we don't
> want to expose, for example, true/false, 0/1, yes/no).
Right ... that's exactly what these are, IMO.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
