Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eu...@timbira.com> writes: > Tom Lane escreveu: >> ISTM your >> argument can be reduced to "there should be no hidden values ever", but >> I doubt we're going to buy that.
> No, the "hidden values" has their use case (hiding legal values that we don't > want to expose, for example, true/false, 0/1, yes/no). Right ... that's exactly what these are, IMO. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs