Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Meanwhile, back at the ranch: I'm fine with applying that patch now that >> it's had some field testing.
> Attached is a version that applies OK to 9.1, after resolving some > conflicts. Review appreciated. It wasn't exactly clear to me how to > handle the ereport/elog calls. It looks sane to me in a quick once-over (bearing in mind I can't test it). What's bothering you about the ereport calls? > What to do pre-9.1 is a bit less clear to me, as the latch machinery > doesn't exist at all in those versions. Some of the fixes can > probably still be pulled out and applied, though. Presumably the changes in win32/socket.c could still be applied; but on the other hand it's not clear there's so much need for them pre-9.1. IIRC most of the point of this patch was to eliminate the tug-of-war over the socket's event attachment between socket.c and win32_latch.c, so maybe there's not a bug pre-9.1. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs