Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes: > Hmm, I wonder if an empty string would be better? It'd look a bit odd, > but at least it would not mislead you to think you're connected to a > database called "none".
Works for me as a back-branch fix, especially since then we're adding
zero new strings to the back branches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
