On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> On 03/18/2011 09:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +<literal>0.0.0.0/0</literal> (<quote>all balls</>) represents all >>>> + IPv4 addresses, and<literal>::</literal> represents >>>> + all IPv6 addresses. >>>> >>>> Umm, isn't there a missing netmask there? The IPv6 analog of 0.0.0.0/0 is >>>> surely ::/0 (or I would usually write it ::0/0). >>> >>> "all balls" seems like a colloquialism best avoided in our documentation. >>> >> >> It's already there, although I agree it's infelicitous. > > I vote for taking it out. I think that could be interpreted as inappropriate.
I agree. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
