Dave Page wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> > > wrote: > >> On 03/18/2011 09:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> > >>> ?wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +<literal>0.0.0.0/0</literal> ?(<quote>all balls</>) represents all > >>>> + ? ? ? IPv4 addresses, and<literal>::</literal> ?represents > >>>> + ? ? ? all IPv6 addresses. > >>>> > >>>> Umm, isn't there a missing netmask there? The IPv6 analog of 0.0.0.0/0 is > >>>> surely ::/0 (or I would usually write it ::0/0). > >>> > >>> "all balls" seems like a colloquialism best avoided in our documentation. > >>> > >> > >> It's already there, although I agree it's infelicitous. > > > > I vote for taking it out. ?I think that could be interpreted as > > inappropriate. > > I agree.
OK, removed. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
