On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. >>> >>> The syntax summary previously failed to clarify that the first >>> argument is also optional. The textual description did mention it, >>> but all the way at the bottom. It fits better with the command >>> overview, so move it there, and fix the summary also. >> >> Is it better to back-patch this to 9.4? The first argument of >> \pset command is optional also in 9.4. > > I didn't feel it necessary, but if you want to, it's OK with me.
Yes, I'm inclined to back-patch that. Because the current description of the syntax of \pset in 9.4 is not correct. >> This commit is in next CF with "Ready for Committer". >> Probably it needs to be marked as "Committed". > > Done. Thanks. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
