On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. >>>> >>>> The syntax summary previously failed to clarify that the first >>>> argument is also optional. The textual description did mention it, >>>> but all the way at the bottom. It fits better with the command >>>> overview, so move it there, and fix the summary also. >>> >>> Is it better to back-patch this to 9.4? The first argument of >>> \pset command is optional also in 9.4. >> >> I didn't feel it necessary, but if you want to, it's OK with me. > > Yes, I'm inclined to back-patch that. Because the current description > of the syntax of \pset in 9.4 is not correct.
Done. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
