Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane ([email protected]) wrote: > > Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes: > > > > It looks to me like this changed the representation of stored rules, so it > > should have included a catversion bump. This is particularly relevant to > > the 9.5 branch where people already have alpha installations. > > I had considererd if a bump was needed and figured it wasn't. > > The WithCheckOption node which was changed doesn't ever end up in the > catalog, I don't believe; certainly not in pg_policy which just stores > the expressions which come from transformWhereClause, which haven't > changed.
Uhm, so why is it in readfuncs.c? If you create a view "WITH CHECK OPTION", the pg_rewrite row says ":withCheckOptions <>". Does that not change with your commit? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
